First Phase
All Creative Grant applicants, including those from previous years, along with ArtCom, participate in the OPEN ASSESSMENT phase.
At the end of the Open Assessment period, scores are tallied, and ArtCom proceeds to the next phase.
1. Creative Merit
Under this theme we consider whether the proposal is plainly funny, clever, beautiful, whimsical, interactive, new to Tankwa Town.
- Do I/we like it?
- Is it innovative?
- Experimental?
- Does it challenge barriers?
- Does it have a statement?
- Does it feel culturally significant?
2. Catalytic Potential
Under this theme we consider whether the proposal has considered its interaction and potential to engage audiences interactively at Tankwa Town.
- What impact will it have on the AfrikaBurn gathering and the cultural landscape (beyond AB) in general?
- What level of engagement/ interactivity does it invite?
- Is there a low barrier to participation?…i.e. parades, easy access for interaction and participation? Does it invite participation?
3. Legacy & Idealism
Under this theme we consider whether the proposal shows a wider reach beyond the lifespan of the actual event in Tankwa Town.
- Will the project create new opportunities in its making or its inventing?
- Does it reach out?
- Is there a broader social contribution?
- Does the project leave anything behind? Infrastructure? Skills development?
- Can it be repurposed?
- Will it have a life after Tankwa Town?
- Will it generate new genres, audiences, debate?
- Does the project use waste materials to make the work?
- Is the method of putting it together inclusive and experimental?
Second Phase
This phase is made of two steps: Selection and Allocation; and Only ArtCom Members participate.
Selection
4. Chances of Success
At this stage, applicants’ names are revealed. The focus shifts to evaluating the feasibility of the project. Under this theme we consider how likely the team is to successfully build what they have proposed. Previous successful track records at AfrikaBurn and other projects are considered. We look at the diversity of skills present in the team and if these align with the proposal
- Likelihood of delivery/success?
- Are the skills necessary to make the project happen available?
- Does the timeline seem realistic?
- Is there sufficient organisational capacity?
- What is the delivery track record at AfrikaBurn and other events?
- Is it worth the risk to be able to develop new Collectives?
- Are there references and do they check out?
The scores from this phase are combined with those from the previous phase to give a final numeric score. These scores serve as a guideline and are not the absolute deciding factor.
It’s important to remember that art at AfrikaBurn is not art in the classic sense. These projects represent communal effort, radical expression, and many other values. It’s not just about their appearance but also what they do.
The grant assessment process takes all factors into account.
Allocation
ArtCom members, who applied for a Creative Grant and/or are closely related to an applicant, are excluded from the fund allocation phase.
Discussion and Final Selection: ArtCom discusses all projects in depth to create a final list. Detailed feedback is compiled and shared with the applicants via email.
Budget Review: Cost breakdowns of shortlisted projects are rigorously assessed, and funds are provisionally allocated. This may involve reducing the number of awarded projects or adjusting the award amounts.
Next Steps
All applicants are informed of their results, including feedback from the Art Committee. ArtCom reaches out to unsuccessful applicants to explore other ways to support their projects.